empty

Generics shortages: A bumpy ride

Will the greater powers the Government now has bring the roller coaster ride of shortages and price hikes to an end at last?

Shortages of generic medicines in recent times have caused problems and created extra work pressures and serious cashflow issues for many contractors. This came to a head with the dramatic and well-publicised price hikes of 2017, which sparked a National Audit Office report and an inquiry by the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC), which earlier this month published its report, calling on the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) to make plans to help address the impact of these price rises on the NHS by the end of the year.

The Health Service Medical Supplies (Costs) Act 2017, which came into force in July this year, has already given the DHSC more powers to control generic prices and obtain information from manufacturers and wholesalers.

Pharmacists report that the price hikes have had a distressing impact on both themselves and their patients. Mike Hewitson, owner of Beaminster Pharmacy in Dorset, describes the situation as “barbaric” and the supply chain as “third world” – but what caused the price hikes in the first place?

Gino Martini, chief scientist at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS), says it is partly a “supply and demand” problem. A lot of generic drugs are “quite old medicines” that have been in existence for over 20 years, he says. As new drugs come on the market, generics are often outsourced to other companies, who may then pass on manufacturing responsibility to other suppliers. Then the number of suppliers dwindles, as does access to the raw materials to make these generic drugs, which can drive up prices.

The closure of manufacturing plants has also contributed to the price hikes, says Warwick Smith, director general of the British Generic Manufacturers Association (BGMA). “It is important to recognise – as the NAO report and the Public Accounts Committee hearing recognised – the reasons for the turbulence in the market was that three generic manufacturing plants had stopped producing for regulatory reasons. Therefore, there was less supply in the market than normal, which puts up prices.”

Mike Hewitson points the finger at wholesalers for creating at least some of this situation. “Some [wholesalers] use high pressure sales tactics, saying ‘this is going short, only a few left’, and try and get you to buy more than normal,” he says.

Different perceptions

Perceptions of the impact the price hikes have had on pharmacists – and their patients – differ. According to the NAO and PAC, the concessionary prices the DHSC set have made sure contractors “are not out of pocket”, says Warwick Smith. “That is to the credit of pharmacy, wholesalers, manufacturers, and indeed the Government, working together to fill the gaps.

“Looking back, it was a very unusual time. The number of products supplied was constrained,” but the system still worked, he says.

From PSNC’s perspective, last year’s spike in generic medicines shortages had “a significant impact on community pharmacies, particularly when combined with other workload and financial pressures”. According to Mike Dent, PSNC director of pharmacy funding, “these combined pressures are having an impact on the longer term future of community pharmacies, as well as on employees and the lives, families, and indeed the mental health of pharmacy contractors”.

Shortages and subsequent price rises still persist for many medicines, he says. “Pharmacies continue to work extremely hard to ensure that patients receive their medicines, and we have made all of these points including, most recently, as part of the PAC inquiry on this topic.”

As well as providing written evidence to the PAC, PSNC North East and Cumbria regional representative Mark Burdon gave oral evidence in which he highlighted the impact that the shortages had had on pharmacies.

Above and beyond

If price increases were reflected in the Drug Tariff, and contractors were correctly reimbursed, they would not be affected by price hikes, says Lila Thakerar, superintendent pharmacist, Shaftesbury Pharmacy in Harrow. However, price hikes by manufacturers often take time to be amended by the DHSC and, in the interim, “it is extremely time-consuming and challenging to get the drugs at the price in the Drug Tariff ”.

Mike Hewitson points out that sporadic price increases have added a huge degree of volatility to managing medicines purchases. “There is great uncertainty. Just this July, a product that cost me approximately £100 a month was suddenly costing £1,500.”

Pharmacists are often in the dark about how much the Government intends to pay, he says. “I don’t know any other industry where you would be expected to operate like that.”

As to the efforts undertaken by pharmacies to minimise any knock-on effects on their patients, Mike Dent says they have gone “above and beyond” to secure stock and make sure patients did not go without their medicines. This has included dispensing part packs, making contact with a wider number of wholesalers in order to track down available stock, and liaising with prescribers to find alternatives. “The workload on pharmacists has been massive,” he says.

PSNC discussed margin delivery including the impact of concession lines at its meeting in July, Dent says, adding that the committee is “united in its view that we must find solutions and get the best possible outcomes for community pharmacies”.

“Although the impact of medicines shortages on any individual pharmacy will vary depending on its specific circumstances, as part of our ongoing margins survey work we identify the financial impact of concession lines and make sure they are taken into account in the final result,” he says.

For pharmacists, “patient care is always top of their minds”, says Salim Jetha, managing director of the Avicenna marketing group of independents. “Shortages have left pharmacists ringing various suppliers to source the required products.”

Having spent so much time sourcing, he says, it is depressing to find out that you actually made a loss. “Then you are in no man’s land where the NHS contract stipulates that you must fulfil the prescription – no right of refusal on commercial grounds – while bankers insist their loans need to be repaid,” he says.

Pharmacists have “bent over backwards” to minimise the impact of price hikes on patients, and this has meant “absorbing losses on medicines” at a time when the sector is already dealing with reduced margins because of funding cuts, says Mike Hewitson.

Such efforts, he says, have come at a price – not only in terms of financial costs, but workload. And then there is the human cost, which he describes as “massive”. “It is about people’s livelihoods, increased stress levels, the impact on the pharmacy team’s health, and on the patient’s health,” he says.

New cost framework

Responding to price hike issues, the Health Service Medical Supplies (Costs) Act 2017 has established a new framework for the DHSC to manage the costs of health service medicines, appliances and borderline substances, “by obtaining comprehensive information about costs in the supply chain”, says Mike Dent.

As part of the Act, the Health Service Products (Provision and Disclosure of Information) Regulations 2018 were introduced on July 1. These regulations give the DHSC greater powers to request information about the price and costs associated with products purchased for the NHS. PSNC’s Mike Dent expects that, “in time, this will help improve the information available for reviewing shortages, which in turn will have an impact on managing price concessions”. The negotiating body “continues to seek a fairer system that is more responsive to price rises and ensures community pharmacy contractors do not carry unreasonable costs on behalf of the NHS”, he says.

Warwick Smith believes the Act is “good news” because the DHSC is now receiving information from all those in the supply chain and, because the Act’s powers relate to all wholesalers, there is a “much better view of prices being charged in the market as a whole”. This means decisions taken by the DHSC that impact on contractors “will be based on fuller and more accurate data”.

While the Act enforces “better controlling of the pricing of generics, there needs to be standardisation of the prices for all manufacturers and suppliers so contractors can fulfil the demands of prescriptions for generics,” suggests Lila Thakerar. “The contractor has to negotiate with suppliers, which should not be the case. This is an absolute distraction from the responsibilities of a pharmacist,” she believes.

Mike Hewitson wants to see “more transparency from and greater regulation of wholesalers”. And he hopes that, in the future, the Government will support pharmacy’s procurement role rather than taking over that responsibility – “as Government interventions in markets rarely do well”.

 

Biosimilars and generics: saving the NHS millions

The growing use of biosimilars and switching high cost medicines to generics have helped save the NHS millions in the last year, according to the financial regulator for the health service.

NHS Improvement says the health service saved £324m in the last financial year by switching from using 10 expensive medicines to better value and equally effective alternatives, and that even more savings will be achieved this year.

Better value biosimilar and generic medicines, “which are just as safe and effective as the more expensive original biological versions”, treat conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, some forms of cancer and inflammatory bowel conditions, NHS Improvement says.

In addition, biosimilars of adalimumab, which treats rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis, and is the medicine on which the NHS currently spends most money, are likely to be available shortly alongside the original biological medicine (Humira).

NHS Improvement says it is working with NHS trusts to make further savings of around £200m this financial year. Around £100m of this will come from savings generated through using new biosimilar medicines as two further original biological medicines come off patent. Biosimilars of trastuzumab, which treats breast cancer, have been commissioned by NHS England as an alternative to the branded medicine Herceptin since July.

“By delivering £324m in savings in a single year from switching to better value but equally effective and safe medicines, the NHS has been able to help more patients manage their conditions,” says Jeremy Marlow, executive director of operational productivity at NHS Improvement.

Dr Keith Ridge, chief pharmaceutical officer, NHS England, says biosimilar medicines are both safe and effective. “As we develop a 10-year plan for the NHS we will be working to promote their use more widely, enabling the NHS to reinvest hundreds of millions of pounds into innovative new treatments and patient care,” he says.

As biosimilars are more recent than generics – there are only eight on the market at the moment – “we are still collecting data” on their value, says BGMA director general Warwick Smith. But a good example of their value that is already apparent is if you look at what has happened with the launch of biosimilar infliximab, he says. “The result is that twice as many patients are being treated for half of the cost.”

Lila Thakerar of Shaftesbury Pharmacy in Harrow says the savings to the NHS by using biosimilars is “enormous”, but that it is difficult to get patients to switch from a familiar product to a totally new drug.

She believes education by prescribers and pharmacists about generics and biosimilars is crucial in advising patients of the savings intended, and assuring them that products are identical and equally effective. “In my experience, the switch to generic inhalers from branded patented products has been the least tolerated change by asthmatics,” she says, to highlight her point.

Recognising the value of pharmacy’s success in driving down medicines prices for the NHS, PSNC would like to see the introduction of substitution services to expand the role community pharmacy plays in this area. “A therapeutic substitution service could enable pharmacies to reduce expenditure by recommending alternative products to prescribers following the dispensing of products on a target list of ‘costly’ medicines, whilst generic substitution would see pharmacies dispensing cheaper generic equivalents in place of certain prescribed branded products that have been agreed at a national level,” says Mike Dent.




This website is for healthcare professionals, people who work in pharmacy and pharmacy students. By clicking into any content, you confirm this describes you and that you agree to Pharmacy Network's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

We use essential, performance, functional and advertising cookies to give you a better web experience. Find out how to manage these cookies here. We also use Interest Based Advertising Cookies to display relevant advertisements on this and other websites based on your viewing behaviour. By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of these Cookies and our Cookie Policy.